Abduction with Hypotheses Confirmation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abduction can be seen as the formal inference corresponding to human hypothesis making. It typically has the purpose of explaining some given observation. In classical abduction, hypotheses could be made on events that may have occurred in the past. In general, abductive reasoning can be used to generate hypotheses about events possibly occurring in the future (forecasting), or may suggest further investigations that will confirm or disconfirm the hypotheses made in a previous step (as in scientific reasoning). We propose an operational framework based on Abductive Logic Programming, extending existing frameworks in many respects, including accommodating dynamic observations and hypothesis confirmation.
منابع مشابه
Abduction for design
This paper describes a logical design process model and in particular abduction in it. We present our model of design processes that consists of abduction, deduction, circumscription, meta-level inference, and multi-world mechanism. In this model, design is a process of re ning descriptions of design objects. Abduction generates object descriptions as a hypothesis, deduction examines validity o...
متن کاملCommon Cause Abduction : Its Scope and Limits
This article aims to analyse the scope and limits of common cause abduction which is a version of explanatory abduction based on Hans Reichenbach’s Principle of the Common Cause. First, it is argued that common cause abduction can be regarded as a rational mechanism for inferring abductive hypotheses that aim to account for the surprising correlations of events. Three arguments are presented in...
متن کاملAbduction Compared with Negation by Failure
Horn clause logic programming can be extended to include abduction with integrity constraints. In the resulting extension of logic programming, negation by failure can be simulated by making negative conditions abducible and by imposing appropriate denials and disjunctions as integrity constraints. This gives an alternative semantics for negation by failure, which generalises the stable model s...
متن کاملQUADERNO DI METODOLOGIA CLINICA CLINICAL METHODOLOGY GUIDE SHERLOCK HOLMES E IL PROCESSO INVESTIGATIVO SHERLOCK HOLMES AND THE INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS “Modus Tollens” Probabilized: Deductive and Inductive Methods in Medical Diagnosis Il “Modus Tollens” Probabilistico: Metodo Deduttivo e Induttivo nella Diagnosi Medica
Background Medical diagnosis has been traditionally recognized as a privileged field of application for so called probabilistic induction. Consequently, the Bayesian theorem, which mathematically formalizes this form of inference, has been seen as the most adequate tool for quantifying the uncertainty surrounding the diagnosis by providing probabilities of different diagnostic hypotheses, given...
متن کاملCost-Optimal Symbolic Abduction for Improved Security
Abduction is a backward inference process for generating and narrowing hypotheses. It has been applied for plan recognition and diagnosis and is crucial for detecting attack plans security applications. Cost-optimal abduction drives the selection of hypotheses towards the ones with minimal costs. Abduction is inherently complex. In this paper, we describe solutions for overcoming the computatio...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005